Counter of Festivals

Ashok Blog for SQL Learners and Beginners and Experts

Wednesday, 4 May 2016

UNION ALL is faster than UNION

UNION ALL is faster than UNION

UNION and UNION ALL are used to combine data or record sets from two different tables. One could combine more than 2 tables. Just like JOINS, UNION combines data into a single record-set but vertically by adding rows from another table. JOINS combine data horizontally by adding columns from another table.
UNION insures you get DISTINCT records from both the tables.
UNION ALL pulls out all records from both the tables with duplicates.

SQL Scripts below proves why UNION ALL is faster than UNION:

1

2
3
4
-- Create First table: #tempTable1

select FirstName, LastName into #tempTable1
from Person.Contact
where ContactID <= 100 

-- Create Second table: #tempTable2 
select FirstName, LastName into #tempTable2 from Person.Contact where ContactID > 100 and ContactID <= 200

Comparison:
1
2
3
4
5
6
SET STATISTICS PROFILE ON
 
-- Using UNION - Query Cost: 35%
select * from #tempTable1
UNION
select * from #tempTable2
Query Plan for UNION:
  |--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([Union1008] ASC, [Union1009] ASC))
       |--Concatenation
            |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable1]))
            |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable2]))
1
2
3
4
-- Using UNION ALL - Query Cost: 13%
select * from #tempTable1
UNION ALL
select * from #tempTable2
Query Plan for UNION ALL:
  |--Concatenation
       |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable1]))
       |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable2]))
1
2
3
4
-- Using UNION ALL with DISTINCT - Query Cost: 52%
select DISTINCT * from #tempTable1
UNION ALL
select DISTINCT * from #tempTable2
Query Plan for UNION ALL with DISTINCT:
  |--Concatenation
       |--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable1].[FirstName] ASC, [tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable1].[LastName] ASC))
       |    |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable1]))
       |--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable2].[FirstName] ASC, [tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable2].[LastName] ASC))
            |--Table Scan(OBJECT:([tempdb].[dbo].[#tempTable2]))
1
2
3
4
5
SET STATISTICS PROFILE OFF
 
-- Final Cleanup
drop table #tempTable1
drop table #tempTable2

The Query plan for:
– UNION ALL SELECT above shows it just does a concatenation.
– UNION SELECT above shows it does a SORT on final concatenation.
– UNION ALL with DISTINCT SELECT above shows it does a SORT of individual tables than does the final concatenation.
The Query cost with:
– UNION ALL = 13%
– UNION = 35%
– UNION ALL with DISTINCT = 52%
This proves that:

  • UNION ALL is faster and more optimized than UNION. But this does not mean you use UNION ALL in every scenario.
  • UNION is not equivalent to “UNION ALL with DISTINCT”.